In today’s hyper-polarized regulatory policy environment, intense conflict over energy policy is a fact of life. Gone are the days when a Republican president created the EPA (Richard Nixon) or ran for office as “the environmental president” (George H.W. Bush), and a Democratic president deregulated natural gas markets (Jimmy Carter). 

Today, the parties are at ideological loggerheads on questions at the intersection of energy and the environment, disagreeing not only about what is best, but also about what is true. Is climate change real and driven by human behavior? Does fracking pose significant risks to groundwater or human health? Do power lines pose health risks to those who live near them? We will explore what the behavioral sciences have to say about why we cannot agree on what is true, let alone what is best, in energy policy debates, and how to overcome those biases.
What You Will Learn

• How law and politics shape the energy and environmental policy debates in the news today
• How some of the centrifugal forces that polarize our politics are traceable to common cognitive biases (to which we are all vulnerable)
• How those biases skew our perception of important facts at the root of the most heated and persistent energy policy disputes
• How interest groups try to amplify and leverage our biases for their own purposes
• How you can try to minimize your own susceptibility to these forces, and understand energy policy issues better

When  Friday, September 4, 2015  11:30AM - 1:00PM
Where  Room 202  AT&T Executive Education and Conference Center, 1900 University Avenue, Austin, TX 78705
Cost  $20, includes lunch.
Parking  AT&T Center Garage Parking and surrounding public lots.